Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illidan Stormrage (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted as recreation of something that was deleted as a result of a discussion. Non-admin closure. Ouro (blah blah) 13:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Illidan Stormrage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Pure plot summary for a video-game character. Not the slightest suggestion of notice outside of the game universe, nor any non-game sources that I can find. CalendarWatcher (talk) 03:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: this has been nominated--and deleted--before, but I don't know whether is qualifies for speedy deletion under {{db-repost}}. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 04:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Previous version deleted via AfD didn't have the WOW inline cites, but that's about the only substantial difference.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - in that case I'm going to request SD instead. Why waste time? // roux 04:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos; redirects are cheap.
- Merge into Warcraft_III:_Reign_of_Chaos#Characters and redirect. No evidence of sufficient notability to warrant its own page. However I oppose (speedy) deletion: if somebody wants to salvage this material to improve the Warcraft III page, why make life hard for them? TotientDragooned (talk) 05:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.