Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stone Sour demos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 14:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Stone Sour demos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. There is a merge request, but nothing substantial and sourced to be merged. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Perfectly reasonable discography. Meets the stand-alone list criteria at WP:SALAT, has clearly defined inclusion criteria, is closely related to an article on a notable topic (Stone Sour), and can reasonably be considered to aid in an detailed understanding of that topic. Please note that this is not an article on a particular demo but rather a list of demos and therefore the presumption against demos at WP:MUSIC is not invoked. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I agree with DFW above. It is reasonable, and it is not on a particular demo; it is a list. Plus, it is a factual article with valid information that people may be interested in, and we should be proud to host such information here at Wikipedia. Epeu (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is a list article and not a stand-alone article for just any demo. Therefore the proper protocol to follow is WP:DISCOGRAPHY, not WP:ALBUM. The argument being made by the nominator here could be applied to an article about one of the demos listed here. But the precedent for discographies seems to allow a list article of this type.DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:31, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.