October 16
edit- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Mormopterus planiceps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be copied from blog at https://strathbogierangesnatureview.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/microbats-in-the-roof/; this is given as attribution, possibly under the impression that it enables reproduction Elmidae (talk) 12:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Julebrus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Packaging artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Pintoint1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image was one of a suite of three (see below) uploaded by User:Nakedicarus. The first of these, File:Us90.jpg, was recently deleted as a blatant copyvio of [1] by User:CactusWriter. Given this, his other images are also suspect, and this one bears a mark - "(F)" - supporting the enormous likelihood that it is a professional photograph for an advertisement or brochure. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Bluepinto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See listing immediately above for why works by User:Nakedicarus are suspect. While this one is not quite as blatant as the other two, it still has the signs of professional photography, including the off-road photography before a striking background and the small image size suggesting it was scraped off the web. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Pasaje.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Seems to be a painting by Ricardo N. Degrossi. Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Source Commons:File:Lennon Ono Trudeau 1969 b.jpg deleted from Commons as copyvio. Kelly hi! 20:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The copyright on the photographs by Duncan Cameron (1928-1985) belongs to Library and archives Canada and those photographs are not offered under a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:SpennemannDirk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no metadata, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 20:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Paullusmagnus-logo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence of permission. Originally uploaded by User:Orangemonster2k1 under a claim of fair use in 2007, shortly after that he removed the fair use notice and added in a Wikimedia logo copyright notice. And even though he said User:Paullusmagnus would give him permission to use his logo, there is no evidence he gave Wikipedia the permission, let alone license it freely. User:Fbot (inactive bot) then tagged the image with non-free orphaned revisions on December 1, 2011, which got removed a month later. Since this image's copyright permission status is unclear, it's probably best to discuss here. 189.25.244.90 (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. The source of this image is likely File:Paullusmagnus-logo (small) reloaded.png. Citing the source, as well as tagging the file with {{GFDL}}, should address any concerns. — ξxplicit 21:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Preschool2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "source-bernicolet" so it is apparently not own work. Stefan2 (talk) 22:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Korean bbq.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- All rights reserved on Flickr. Flickr doesn't use version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences either. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- All rights reserved on Flickr. Flickr doesn't use version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Cc-by-nc-nd on Flickr. Flickr doesn't use version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Complicated security features. Unlikely to be below the threshold of originality. Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.